Friday, April 23, 2010
We're Short On Livestock
Monday, April 19, 2010
Pat Robertson, meet Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi
Image by Getty Images via DaylifeA senior Iranian cleric says women who wear immodest clothing and behave promiscuously are to blame for earthquakes.Has a familiar ring, doesn't it?
"What can we do to avoid being buried under the rubble?" Sedighi asked during a prayer sermon Friday. "There is no other solution but to take refuge in religion and to adapt our lives to Islam's moral codes."It's always been hard to understand how extremely conservative Christians don't see how they are just the same as extremely conservative Islamics. The name you use to call on your God of intolerance is not the point. Fundamentalists are fundamentalists, no matter what the creed.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Iranian Cleric: Promiscuous Women Cause Earthquakes (alan.com)
- Cleric blames women for earthquakes (guardian.co.uk)
- Scantily-dressed women cause earthquakes, Iranian cleric says (telegraph.co.uk)
- Iranian cleric would like you sluts to stop causing Earthquakes (trueslant.com)
- Iranian cleric: Promiscuous women cause quakes (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Haiti's Pact with the Devil: What is Pat Robertson Referencing? (time.com)
- Extramarital sex fuels earthquakes, Iranian cleric says (calgaryherald.com)
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Happy Tax Day
Image by Getty Images via DaylifeTuesday, April 13, 2010
Has Everyone Gone to the Tea Party?
Image by Fibonacci Blue via FlickrIt does seem very likely that the Tea Party draws from the same group of sadsacks of disontent who were around anyway, with time on their hands since their income so often derives from SSI.
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Breaking News - Conservative Republican Fails To Fan Flames of Hatred
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Sarah Palin Wants Tea Baggers To Harass Drivers?
There, that feels better. And a good Pesach to all.
Monday, March 29, 2010
New One On Me
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
The Misinformation Age
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
G.E. Still Hearts Ronnie.
Dick Meister remembers Reagan's attitude toward working people the way I do, only better. If you'd like your memory refreshed read his Ronald Reagan's War on Labor.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Glenn Beck, meet Bruce Springsteen
Glenn Beck got hold of the lyrics to Born in the USA and, like other conservatives before him, was chagrined. It happens over and over and demonstrates what must be obvious to everyone by now. Conservatives don't listen. Or read. Most albums used to come with lyric sheets. Springsteen is, of course, one of the most consistent, outspoken progressives in rock music. But then, who can a conservative rely on, musically speaking? Well, there's always good Ted Nugent. They've got Ted on their side all right. There are a few others in the world of rock music but not a whole lot of the important ones. The conservative will find greener pastures in the world of country music, but it's certainly not monolithic so even there, they'll need to listen to the words to be sure.
Conservatives need to give it up and chill with some nice Lawrence Welk. Rock music is inherently free-thinking and it was the idealogical forebears of Glenn Beck who saw that in early rock and roll and tried to kill it in its cradle. To put in high school terms - which seems appropriate - rock music is the always alluring Rebel and the Glenn Becks of the world are the Hall Monitor. And the Hall Monitor was pretty much beneath contempt.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Glenn Beck Finally Gets Around To Denouncing Bruce Springsteen (huffingtonpost.com)
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Birth Certificates
"
Sunday, July 5, 2009
It's About the Country! And Stuff.
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
The response in the main stream media has been most predictable, ironic, and as always, detached from the lives of ordinary Americans who are sick of the “politics of personal destruction”. How sad that Washington and the media will never understand; it’s about country. And though it's honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a different standard applies for the decisions I make. But every American understands what it takes to make a decision because it’s right for all, including your family.
She did this for her country. Presumably because Sarah Palin being governor of just one state past the end of the month was damaging to the USA. I guess. Your guess is as good as anyone's. As of this morning there's still no one who seems to have any idea what she was talking about, except that not quitting would be the quitter's way out. Sarah Palin is no quitter, except for quitting her job, of course.
Sarah will keep busy. She has a book to sell and fortune to be made of her fame before it goes stale. What she does not have, as far as her lawyer is aware, are federal indictments coming up any time soon. Best not speculate about any rumors floating around out there or he'll sue your ass. Even though the Alaska constitution guarantees free speech. I'd have thought that the federal Bill of Rights had that covered, but apparently up there they rely on Alaska's constitution for such things. Repeating such rumors is probably defamation of character, unlike, say, referring to Barack Obama as "palling around with terrorists" which is just artistic license.
- If you're a lame duck you should leave office.
- If you're limited to two terms, which is common enough, your second term is all lame duckitude, so if re-elected you should quit.
- Campaigns are expensive, exhausting and they eat your soul. So, why bother standing for re-election if you're quitting.
- If you're not standing for re-election then you're now a lame duck, ala Palin, so you need to quit.
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Frank Rich on Hate and the People Who Enable It
The question, Shepard Smith said on Fox last week, is “if there is really a way to put a hold on” those who might run amok. We’re not about to repeal the First or Second Amendments. Hard-core haters resolutely dismiss any “mainstream media” debunking of their conspiracy theories. The only voices that might penetrate their alternative reality — I emphasize might — belong to conservative leaders with the guts and clout to step up as McCain did last fall. Where are they? The genteel public debate in right-leaning intellectual circles about the conservative movement’s future will be buried by history if these insistent alarms are met with silence.
It’s typical of this dereliction of responsibility that when the Department of Homeland Security released a plausible (and, tragically, prescient) report about far-right domestic terrorism two months ago, the conservative response was to trash it as “the height of insult,” in the words of the G.O.P. chairman Michael Steele. But as Smith also said last week, Homeland Security was “warning us for a reason.”Ironically, some conservative leaders did demonstrate some guts and common sense that bit of bravery might also serve to begin digging them out of the deep, dark hole they're in -especially if said conservative leaders are also closely identified with the GOP. At the moment, serious people can't take most Republicans or conservatives seriously. Their fortunes might start to change if they began acting like adults.
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Old Bigot Prefers Old Bigotry
Image via Wikipedia
In yet another blatantly racist attack on Sonia Sotomayer, Pat Buchanan attributes every her every accomplishment to affirmative action and opines,
One prefers the old bigotry. At least it was honest, and not, as Abraham Lincoln observed, adulterated "with the base alloy of hypocrisy."
In other news salmon swim upstream to spawn and the sun rises in the east. So, let’s review. Pat thinks Sonia Sotomayor is not smart enough for a SCOTUS appointment but Sarah Palin is fit to be president.
He, of course, also prone to hanging around with a very bad crowd, as his speaking invitation to a white nationalist demonstrates.
It’s time to retire him from MSNBC and mainstream media. His xenophobic, racist ideology is showing bigtime and should not be legitimized as part of the national discourse . Please let’s leave the unabashed racists to themselves.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Eric Alterman: Think Again: Sotomayor and SCOTUS: Captured on a Carousel of Time (huffingtonpost.com)
- Republicans Continue To Project (dailykos.com)
- Buchanan's Creepy Racial Obsessions Continuously Rewarded By Media (VIDEO) [UPDATED] (huffingtonpost.com)
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Sorry Wingnuts - He's All Yours
Image via Wikipedia
Of course the people who make their livings off of the worst instincts of the right wing base are anxious to deflect any blame for the most recent murder by a far right extremist. And given their propensity for opposite logic it’s not a big surprise that they’ve decided that Von Brunn is a leftist.
Ironically, the voices of vitriol – Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, right wing bloggers and the rest might be less responsible for this individual’s actions than the other murders that have taken place in recent months. It’s complicated. Von Brunn’s world view intersects with the birthers and tea baggers who are encouraged by the right wing punditizers. He would meet kindred spirits at any Palin rally. But still and all,he’s 88 years old. He’s been who he is for a long, long time. He’s done reckless things before, even serving time in jail. It’s just possible that something as simple as having a black president could have sent him out to do this murder. That doesn’t mean they don’t have real responsibility for the violent climate that’s been emerging since the election. Their rhetoric is dangerous. And they should be very afraid that a critical mass of people will finally call them on it. Much more of this and that could happen.
By people, I mean the Republicans that line up to genuflect to them. I mean mainstream media which treats them as voices on one side of the political spectrum instead of the irresponsible shock jocks that they are. That includes the media that we mostly like. Why does Frank Gaffney get a platform on Hardball, for instance? The things he’s said recently should completely marginalize him, and yewe pretend he has something to say? When it comes to Limbaugh and Beck, maybe we’re all guilty. They’re such trainwrecks that it’s hard to look away, but perhaps we should all try.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Holocaust Museum Shooting Should Teach Conservatives To Tone Down Their Rhetoric (usnews.com)
- Joseph A. Palermo: Glenn Beck Spins the Holocaust Museum Shooting (huffingtonpost.com)
- Limbaugh pushes "Obama not born in the US" story on day Holocaust shooter, who believes same thing, shoots up museum (americablog.com)
- Holocaust denial and hate (scienceblogs.com)
- Which Murder Is More Newsworthy? Bill O'Reilly Debates (mediabistro.com)
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Fire In A Crowded Theater
How many people have been killed in the last few months by domestic extremists? Well, I was about to write a post about that very thing but turns out TPM poster known as The Commenter Formerly Known As NCSteve pretty much covered all the ground I had in mind.
So my question is this. How many more murderous rampages by enraged rightists--whether executed or merely in the planning stage--are we going to have to endure before the traditional media is willing to acknowledge and address the obvious? How many people are going to die, and how highly placed will the victims have to be, before someone connects the dots and starts calling out the ever more violent, hateful and apocalyptic rhetoric of the likes of Coulter, Malkin, O'Reilly, Hannity and Savage as bearing some responsibility for creating this climate of insanity?
Raving mad rhetoric has been mainstreamed by right wing radio, cable news and, of course, the intertubes and to some extent even by elected officials. This rash of killings is not, as was posited on Hardball tonight, completely separate from any political party. It is lunacy that is absolutely predictably inflamed by talking points that are treated as just another point of view.
It’s clear that having our first African-American president, the economic climate and the repudiation of conservatism has combined to send some lunatics right over the edge. There’s no question of shutting down freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean that the kind of hate speech that’s become so commonplace shouldn’t be much more seriously marginalized by mainstream media and strenuously criticized by mainstream political figures – Republicans and Democrats alike.
Also, I’m just wondering if Shep Smith (and others who receive them) are turning over those untold number of hate filled e-mails to the appropriate authorities? I assume that the Secret Service is already spending a fair amount of time at Free Republic where the legitimacy our our duly elected president is questioned with regularity. I just hope they’re taking every thread like that very seriously.
*Updated to add quotes and clarity
Monday, June 1, 2009
Can We Learn Anything From George Tiller’s Murder?
When I read about the murder a few hours ago, I was going to post something to the effect that the apologists should be making statements shortly. There was always a script for it. Pro-life groups would condemn the act and after about 24 hours or so there’d be a“but” attached to the condemnation. It’s always something to the effect that the victim of the murder was, after all, someone who took innocent life, but killing is never, ever acceptable. Well, things are moving a lot faster these days and not everyone is quite so delicate about it.Statements have been pouring out from pro-life groups, abortion rights groups and everyone else who will make a statement. Randall Terry, for one, does not seem to feel constrained to express any condemnation other than to regret that Dr. Tiller was not afforded time to meet his Maker.
Grandpa Eddie reminds us of that report that had some right wing panties in a bunch. The one that referred to home grown terrorists. Sounds like it was right on to me. He also provides a retrospective of violent acts of terrorism targeting abortion providers.
Fitness for the Occasion makes the very simple, but insightful, point that things like this are the problem with calling abortion murder.
So, there are lessons about domestic terrorism, lessons about rhetoric and how not to use it, and I’d hope there is a lesson about thinking hard about how a public message might affect persons who have serious mental health issues.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Terry's Moment (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
- Far-Right Subtly-Celebrates Tiller Murder (talkingpointsmemo.com)
- George Tiller assassinated (washingtonmonthly.com)
- Varying Responses to Dr. Tiller's Murder (themoderatevoice.com)
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Sonia Sotomayor v Bigotry
Image by dbking via Flickr
This whole "reverse racism" thing might have seemed like a good idea for stirring up the low information, white, male, unemployed demographic, but they're taking it way too far like they've done with everything else and allowing everyone to see exactly what they're about.
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Governor Perry Says He's Not A Rebel, No, No, No
Image by Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com via Flickr
Saturday, May 16, 2009
The Mentally Stable Need Not Apply
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=cc908cf0-ac80-4a1c-b57d-95a8d3406a01)


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=eb433fcc-89b4-466b-8ffd-3f31e17ad331)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=96dfdd4a-4191-4ece-b5af-e7b07c16a475)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f0d53806-79ff-4189-9bff-6e7af30325a9)







